BHP is an Anglo-Australian mining and petroleum company headquartered in Melbourne, Australia, and listed on the London Stock Exchange with a major management office in London. It is the world’s largest mining company with a value of almost $130 billion in 2020. It has 33 operations in 15 different countries around the world as shown in the map below, including coal, copper, iron ore, nickel, petroleum and potash. While the company is eager to present all of these as success stories of progress and great contributions to ‘development’, they are in fact stories of environmental degradation, water pollution, climate change, destroyed livelihoods and dangerous risks to people’s health and even lives.
Across the world local communities have been opposing BHP’s operations for years. What follows is a brief summary of the main struggles that LMN is currently involved with. For a more extensive list of controversies and issues surrounding BHP operations, as well as BHP’s dark past, we invite you to look at our alternative timeline of the company’s history and our 2020 report on BHP. Our 2020 report ‘Cut and Run’ gives an in-depth account of BHP’s legacy issues in Indonesia and Papua New Guinea, where the company still refuses to take responsibility for the destructive impacts of the Indomet coal mine and Ok Tedi copper and gold mine respectively.
Aftermath of the disastrous Samarco dam collapse
In November 2015, the collapse of the Fundão tailings dam in Minas Gerais, Brazil, led to 45 million cubic metres of mining waste spilling into the Rio Doce and its tributaries. Its collapse resulted in 20 people being killed, the destruction of the settlements of Bento Rodrigues, Paracatu de Baixo and Gesteira, and the degradation of 637 kilometres of the river basin with severe knock-on effects. The dam was owned by a joint venture of BHP and Vale, who failed to respond adequately in terms of cleaning up the river and supporting those affected by the disaster and compensating them. LMN’s 2017 report includes a detailed assessment of the impacts of the dam collapse.
Five years after the disaster, less than 15% of planned new dwellings in the settlements that were destroyed are under construction and none have been completed. BHP refuses to take responsibility for this disgraceful delay, while the delay in compensation continues to increase people’s vulnerability. Moreover, the company claims that the river has recovered from the disaster, without scientific evidence to support this claim and in contrast to local reports. Read the LMN statement for the Samarco disaster’s 5th anniversary here.
Cerrejón’s environmental degradation and displacement of indigenous people
The Cerrejón coal mine is jointly owned by Anglo American, BHP and Glencore. The giant open-pit mine is located in La Guajira, northern Colombia, where it has displaced and continues to displace indigenous Wayuu and African descent communities. Local communities have often been relocated and face multiple issues as a result, including loss of their livelihood. Meanwhile many of the alternative economic projects set up with Cerrejón funding have failed, leaving people without adequate incomes. The mining operations have also severely damaged the natural environment such that local people fear the land will never recover even after mining stops. This includes destruction of local watercourses which have exacerbated conflict over water as local communities report not having enough water. Additionally, pollution and dust from the coal mine has caused the contamination of water supplies and the air.
In our 2020 briefing we elaborate on two main issues regarding BHP’s responsibility for Cerrejón. The first is BHP’s failure to comply with legal orders by the Colombian Constitutional Court and other courts in the country around environmental damage and violation of rights. The second is regarding BHP’s strategy in light of the pressure to phase out coal. Instead of a closure plan with a just transition, the strategy aims to reduce the operational costs at the expense of the workers and to facilitate expansion of the mine by diverting water sources.
Using up Chile’s precious water resources
BHP operates two mines in Chile’s Atacama Desert, which have both severely depleted local water resources at a time when Chile is experiencing a megadrought. The Escondida mine (majority owned by BHP) is the world’s largest copper mine and wastes over three times as much water as any other BHP operation. Meanwhile, the Cerro Colorado mine has been extracting almost three times as much water as it was authorised to. This has resulted in damage to lakes and wetlands that cannot easily be reversed, while many people whose livelihoods depend on the land have been forced to move to urban areas. BHP is facing multiple lawsuits for over-extraction of water in Chile.
Resolution Copper’s planned destruction of sacred land
BHP is the minority owner (45%, along with Rio Tinto 55%) of Resolution Copper, which is proposing a large copper mine near Superior, Arizona. The proposed mine would destroy the religious and sacred place known as Oak Flat, including a public campground and potentially up to 6,000 hectares of public land. The project includes a controversial and technically problematic deep underground block cave mine 2,134 meters below the surface of Oak Flat. This would create a crater roughly 3,200 meters wide and 300 meters deep due to subsidence of the land. The project has already received much opposition due to its environmental impacts and how it will affect the indigenous peoples to whom Oak Flat is sacred. BHP claims they have the legal right to build the mine in the manner they intend to, while denying that the area is culturally significant to some and refusing to demonstrate the infeasibility of alternate mining methods.
The Billiton company was established and acquired the right to mine on Billiton and Bangka Islands. Billiton continued to mine at Bangka island until 1958. Tin mining is a lucrative but destructive trade that has scarred the island’s landscape, bulldozed its farms and forests, killed off its fish stocks and coral reefs, and dented tourism to its pretty palm-lined beaches. The damage is best seen from the air, as pockets of lush forest huddle amid huge swaths of barren orange earth. [Picture?] This remote island of the Indonesian archipelago continues to be stripped of its forests and dug up for tin used in millions of mobile phones, tablets and laptops. The mining is often illegal and hazardous and yet few of the leading brands have control over where the tin is sourced from and how it is affecting nature and people who mine it. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2012/nov/23/tin-mining-indonesia-bangkahttps://www.theguardian.com/environment/gallery/2014/may/29/tin-mining-on-bangka-island-of-indonesia-in-pictures
BHP began construction of Ok Tedi copper and gold mine in Papua New Guinea. Operations began in 1984 and the company dumped untreated mining waste into the river system. More than 2,000 square kilometres of forest has been damaged or destroyed by mine tailings (waste). The hunting, fishing and garden areas of an estimated 40,000 local and Indigenous people have been damaged or destroyed. Fish populations have declined by 95 percent in the Ok Tedi River compromising people’s livelihoods, food security and forest based culture. Mount Fubilan, the site of the Ok Tedi Mine, has been reduced from a peak of over 2,000m, to a 3km wide open pit, the bottom of which lies at sea level. Ok Tedi is noticeably absent from BHP’s own timelineWhat happened next? See BHP 2002 below.https://londonminingnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/EMBARGOED-Cut-and-run.-How-Britains-top-two-mining-companies-have-wrecked-ecosystems.pdf
BHP acquired full ownership of the Cerro Matoso ferro-nickel mine in Colombia but was involved in extraction from the start in 1982. In the 1990s evidence started to emerge of the devastating health impacts on local indigenous (Zenú and Embera) and African-descent communities which was subsequently confirmed by the Colombian Institute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Science and presented to the Colombian Constitutional Court. Alarmingly high rates of miscarriage, birth defects and cancer were found to be widespread in nearby communities and have been linked to the heavy metal contamination found in local air, soil and water. https://terra-justa.org/dc_2017/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/BHP-Fine-Words-Foul-Play-Sept-23.pdf See BHP 2015 below for further developments and legacy issues.
Billiton 2000
Billiton acquired the Colombian Govt company`s 50% share in El Cerrejon mine in consortium with Anglo American and Glencore. This is one of the largest open-pit coal mines in the world. Mining operations began in 1985, at exactly the same time as the underground coal mines in the UK were closed and Cerrejon became a major supplier of coal to the UK. http://www.minesandcommunities.org/article.php?a=6676What happened next? See BHP 2001 and 2020 below
BHP Billiton 2001
2001 BHP and Billiton merged to become BHP Billiton, combining the mines they own into a huge portfolio.
Olympic Dam mine is a large poly-metallic underground mine in South Australia. It is the fourth largest copper deposit and the largest known single deposit of uranium in the world. It is mired in controversy. Conservationists want BHP to stop using evaporation ponds at Olympic Dam that kill hundreds of birds, including threatened species. Despite the fact that storage of the tailings, which include radioactive materials and acids, has been controversial since Olympic Dam’s previous owner, Western Mining Corporation, confirmed in 1994 that 5 billion cubic metres of the tailings fluids had leaked out of the storage facilities and into an aquifer underground, the company plans to expand the height of the tailings dam walls and increase the volume of radioactive tailings stored. Work is expected to be completed by 2023 despite strong opposition. The consequence of potential failure of Olympic Dam tailings dams is rated “extreme.” https://nuclear.foe.org.au/olympic-dam/https://www.wise-uranium.org/umopauod.htmlhttps://theecologist.org/2020/sep/15/bhp-betrays-international-safety-efforts
BHP Billiton 2008
Approval to mine nickel and cobalt (Hallmark Nickel Project) in Davao Oriental, Mindanao, was given by the Philippines government in 2004/05 to a joint venture between BHP Billiton and AMCOR (Asiaticus Management Corp of the Philippines). Two large protected key biodiversity areas could be affected and many local people feared that the mine would also destroy their livelihoods as farmers and fishermen. In 2008, UK organisation CAFOD (Catholic Agency For Overseas Development) accused AMCOR of imposing the mine on Philippine villagers by bribing community leaders to agree to it, and stated that BHP Billiton applied insufficient due diligence over its joint venture partner. It also accused the company of giving communities insufficient information about the potential impacts of the project. In 2009, BHP pulled out of the partnership, selling its forty percent share to AMCOR http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/7684860.stmhttps://theanarchistlibrary.org/library/against-the-hallmark-nickel-project-philippineshttp://www.piplinks.org/system/files/Mining+or+Food+Case+Study+4.pdfKept in the Dark: Why it’s time for BHP Billiton to let communities in the Philippines have their sayCAFOD Report 2008
2014
BHP and Rio Tinto (in a joint venture called Resolution Copper) sought for years to access the underground copper deposit in the Tonto National Forest, next to the San Carlos Apache reservation. The San Carlos Apache and other tribes have always been opposed to mining at Oak Flat, Arizona, a sacred site used for religious ceremonies. However there are no federal laws giving Native Americans control of ancestral lands that are outside reservation boundaries. The tribes were blindsided in 2014 when a proposal to exchange federally owned Oak Flat for private land owned by Resolution Copper was included, at the last minute, in a defence spending bill at the behest of four Arizona members of Congress who supported Resolution’s mining plans; the bill was signed into law by the president, Barack Obama with the caveat that the swap could not occur until an environmental study was published which was due to be in 2021 (see 2020 below). https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2020/nov/24/trump-mining-arizona-holy-land-oak-flat-tribeshttps://www.earthworks.org/stories/oak_flat_apache_leap/http://apache-stronghold.com/index.htmlhttps://news.trust.org/item/20201207050319-2de9k
BHP 2015
To continue the story of Cerro Matoso from 1997 above, in 2015 a new company, South32, was spun out of BHP and took over the Cerro Matoso operations, allowing BHP to distance itself from an operation laden with liabilities. Despite BHP’s denial of its role in the deteriorating health of nearby communities, in March 2018 the Colombian Constitutional Court found South32 (the new company) responsible for irreparable damage to local communities and ordered it to compensate those communities. After South32 appealed, the compensation order was nullified by the court in September 2018. The company was allowed to continue its mining operations whilst at the same time responding to the Court order to re-apply for its mining licensing as its operations did not meet environmental standards. Local communities have been targeted by paramilitaries, threats and violence being directed at critics of the company’s operations. https://terra-justa.org/dc_2017/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/BHP-Fine-Words-Foul-Play-Sept-23.pdfhttps://newint.org/features/2016/11/01/we-are-slowly-being-killed-by-this-mine
